![]() ![]() Surely Griffiths doesn't explain all, but when it is necessary in footnote he say to the reader a place where find information. ![]() Secondarily, there is nothing bad in check that a function solve a differential equation, Griffiths focus on physics and (only sometimes) he give the mathematical solution of physical equations like if they were found by a stroke of luck. Someone said that Griffiths explanation of the separation of variables technique is painful: simply I disagree: I have a mediocre brain and I understood Griffiths reasoning. Surely price and absence of solutions are valid complaint (but in Italy the price is a more reasonable 40 euro) but I decidedly disagree with others complaint you can read sometimes in this forum.įor me that only know complex and Fourier analysis (I don't know higher mathematics) Griffiths was beautiful. ![]() It is true that once authors taken seriously their job (think to Born books or to delicious old Dover) while today we are submerged by always new books of little quality, but Griffiths books are rare exceptions. (preamble: I'm sorry for the english but I'm not mother tongue) 3.3 Einenfunctions of a Hermitian Operatorģ.4 Generalized Statistical InterpretationĤ.1 Schrodinger Equation in Spherical Coordinates ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |